Finance

Bitcoin bear market 2024 prediction: Cowen's dire warning

Marcus van den BergSenior tech journalist covering AI, software, and digital trends4 min readUpdated April 1, 2026
Bitcoin bear market 2024 prediction: Cowen's dire warning

Key Takeaways

  • Benjamin Cowen's latest video, 'Bitcoin: Preparing for the Next Leg Down,' argues that Bitcoin's recent price rallies are classic bear market deceptions, not the start of a new bull run.
  • Cowen draws on historical midterm year data from 2014, 2018, and 2022, flawed indicator interpretation, and late-cycle macroeconomic signals to make the case that further significant downside is coming.
  • The video is a direct pushback against the narrative that Bitcoin is outperforming traditional assets and that key support levels like 60K will hold.

The Bear Market Playbook Nobody Wants to Read

Bear markets are not slow, obvious declines where every week is redder than the last. They are exhausting precisely because they aren't. They hand you rallies that feel like recoveries. They let the bulls make noise. Then they take it back, and then some. In Bitcoin: Preparing for the Next Leg Down, Benjamin Cowen opens his analysis by pointing to his own January 15th macro risk memo, which called a local top between 97K and 98K before a meaningful drop. That call aged well. The broader point is that counter-trend rallies are a feature of bear markets, not evidence that the bear market is over. Most investors know this in theory and forget it the moment price starts moving up again.

February Lows, March Fakeouts, April Pain

The midterm year pattern Cowen outlines is specific enough to be uncomfortable. In 2014, 2018, and 2022, Bitcoin found a low in February, produced a lower high in March often right at resistance like the 21-week EMA or 20-week SMA, and then sold off further into April. Three data points is not a law of physics, but it is a pattern worth respecting. What makes the current setup notable is that Bitcoin hasn't even reached those moving average resistance levels this time around, which either means the next leg down has already started from a lower launch point, or any rally into that resistance still has a ceiling waiting for it. Neither interpretation is bullish. It is the kind of historical rhyme that gets dismissed as coincidence right up until it isn't.

The Outperformance Myth

There is a version of the Bitcoin narrative circulating right now that goes something like this: Bitcoin is outperforming gold and the S&P 500, therefore it's showing relative strength, therefore the macro headwinds don't apply. Cowen dismantles this cleanly. Bitcoin's recent gains against those assets are recoveries from a much steeper prior decline, not evidence of genuine outperformance. Against the S&P 500, Bitcoin's ratio hasn't touched its 20-week SMA since October. That is not what outperformance looks like. That is what a relief bounce inside a downtrend looks like, and confusing the two is exactly how investors end up holding bags they didn't mean to buy.

Our AnalysisMarcus van den Berg, Senior tech journalist covering AI, software, and digital trends

Our Analysis: Cowen gets the cycle psychology right. Most retail traders are anchored to recent price, not the 80% drawdown that came before it. Calling Bitcoin's recovery a "win" against gold or the S&P 500 is a convenient amnesia play, and he's correct to call it out.

Where he stops short is the macro feedback loop. A late business cycle doesn't just pressure Bitcoin, it pulls institutional liquidity out entirely. The 200-week MA isn't just a technical target, it's where forced sellers meet no buyers.

The February low, March dead cat, April flush pattern is three cycles old now. Ignore it if you want.

What's worth adding to this picture is the structural shift in who is holding Bitcoin now versus prior cycles. Spot ETF approval brought in a class of institutional allocator that treats crypto as a risk-on satellite position, not a conviction hold. When those allocators de-risk in response to late-cycle macro signals, they don't rotate into stablecoins and wait — they exit the asset class entirely and move into cash or short-duration treasuries. That dynamic creates a seller profile that prior cycle models never had to account for, and it could make the drawdown mechanics sharper and faster than the historical midterm patterns suggest.

There's also the derivatives overhang to consider. Leverage has been rebuilt quietly during the recent bounce, and funding rates have stayed elevated longer than they typically do in genuine capitulation phases. That combination — new institutional sellers above and leveraged retail longs below — is not a setup that resolves quietly. Cowen's analysis focuses on the pattern, but the plumbing underneath that pattern has changed in ways that add risk, not reduce it.

The most underappreciated element of his argument may be the simplest one: the market has not yet had a moment of genuine fear. Sentiment has been cautious, not broken. Bear markets typically don't end until they produce a capitulation that flushes out even the reluctant holders. We haven't seen that flush. That alone is reason to take the downside case seriously.

Frequently Asked Questions

How low could Bitcoin go in the next leg down based on current bear market patterns?
Cowen's historical comparisons to 2014, 2018, and 2022 midterm year cycles suggest the next meaningful support levels are well below current prices, though he stops short of naming a specific floor. The 200-week moving average has historically acted as the ultimate bear market bottom for Bitcoin, and depending on where that sits during a Q2 2024 sell-off, a retest of the low-to-mid 50K range or lower is within the pattern's logic. (Note: specific price targets are speculative and debated among analysts — this reflects pattern-based inference, not a verified forecast.)
Why do analysts predict Bitcoin will keep dropping despite recent rallies and bullish signals?
The core argument is that bear market rallies are designed to look exactly like recoveries — that's what makes them effective traps. Cowen's case rests on the Bitcoin-to-S&P 500 ratio failing to reclaim its 20-week SMA since October, the MVRV Z-score not confirming a genuine reset, and the weekly RSI showing readings that have historically appeared mid-bear-cycle rather than at true bottoms. When multiple indicators point in the same direction and the historical midterm year pattern from 2014, 2018, and 2022 rhymes this closely, dismissing the downside case requires more than a short-term price bounce.
Is Bitcoin actually outperforming the S&P 500 right now, or is that misleading?
It's misleading in context. Bitcoin's recent gains against the S&P 500 follow a period where it fell significantly harder, so the ratio recovering doesn't mean Bitcoin is leading — it means it's partially clawing back a deeper loss. The Bitcoin-to-S&P 500 ratio not touching its 20-week SMA since October is a concrete signal that the relative strength narrative is being overstated by bulls. Cowen's point here is one of his stronger ones and isn't seriously contested in the data he presents.
Could the Bitcoin bear market 2024 prediction be wrong if macroeconomic conditions improve faster than expected?
Yes, and this is the most significant gap Cowen's analysis leaves open. His framework is heavily pattern-based and assumes the current business cycle correlation — where Bitcoin tracks late-cycle macro deterioration — holds. If the Fed pivots earlier or recession fears ease materially in Q2, the historical midterm year script breaks down. Cowen acknowledges counter-trend rallies are possible but doesn't model a scenario where macro conditions genuinely reverse; that's a limitation worth noting before treating his outlook as a base case. (Note: macroeconomic forecasting carries high uncertainty — multiple credible analysts disagree on the 2024 recession timeline.)
Is 2026 going to be a bull or bear market for crypto?
Cowen's analysis doesn't extend to 2026 directly, but the implication of his midterm year framework is that a sustained bear cycle playing out through 2024 could set up a genuine recovery phase by 2025 or 2026 — consistent with Bitcoin's approximate four-year halving and cycle structure. However, mapping a specific year to a bull or bear outcome this far out is more narrative than analysis. We're not certain, and anyone presenting 2026 as a confident call is likely extrapolating beyond what current data supports.

Based on viewer questions and search trends. These answers reflect our editorial analysis. We may be wrong.

✓ Editorially reviewed & refined — This article was revised to meet our editorial standards.

Source: Based on a video by Benjamin CowenWatch original video

This article was created by NoTime2Watch's editorial team using AI-assisted research. All content includes substantial original analysis and is reviewed for accuracy before publication.